SAFENANO Community

     The UK's premier source of information on nanoparticle hazard,
     and nanotoxicology
in Search

Bryony Ross

SafeNano Staff Blog

Scotman's 'Nanosilver fad' sparks lively discussion

An article on the potential health risks of nanosilver published in 'The Scotsman' newspaper has prompted fresh debate in this controversial area.

The article, published in Sunday's issue of The Scotsman, attempts to examine exactly how safe use of as-yet unregulated colloidal nanosilver products really is, features commentary from all sides of the debate. Expert scientific commentary is from Professor Vicki Stone (SAFENANO’s Director of Toxicology & Napier University) and Professor Ken Donaldson (SnIRC & Edinburgh University), and  opinion on the merits or otherwise of colloidal silver from a UK-based seller and long term users is also featured.

Already the article has sparked some lively debate on the Scotsman online – but I'm curious as to what SAFENANO's readers think  - is the article is a fair representation of the current state of play, does taking nanosilver in this manner pose a risk to health or are the concerns completely unfounded - the floor is open!  

Comments

 

Francis Sedgemore - Nanosilver fad could rot the brain said:

November 24, 2008 20:17
 

andrew.maynard@physics.org said:

Nano-silver seems to be the flavour of the moment, judging by the number of articles appearing!  Intriguingly, the Scotsman article starts out with with a good old British scare-story tone (you could have thought you were reading about the latest substance abuse fad), but then gets into some serious issues.

All the evidence suggests that nano-silver isn't that toxic to people in small doses (the environment is another matter) - but it still seems to be foolishness to allow people to self-administer a powerful material (because it is a potent antimicrobial)  with little or no idea of what they are doing.  And it seems even more foolish to have a regulatory system that seems powerless to do anything about it!

And finally, just to flag up that there have been a coupe of good resources on nano-silver published recently.

The first is Sam Luoma's extensive and excellent review of the science and what it means - available at http://www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/7036/nano_pen_15_final.pdf  (my comments on the report are published at: http://2020science.org/2008/09/09/8909-nano-silver-old-problems-or-new-challenges/ )

The second is a short but again excellent background piece published by ICON, and available at: http://cohesion.rice.edu/centersandinst/icon/resources.cfm?doc_id=12722

Andrew Maynard

November 25, 2008 12:02
 

Rob@safenano.org said:

The nano-silver debate rumbles on. Nice to see that the important role played by Vicki Stones hairdresser, as exclusively revealed on SAFENANO continues to get a mention. This material seems to be cropping up everywhere and largely in applications where direct exposure to humans is the intended outcome, either by ingestion as a food supplement, or topical application. Many of the products are also available in a form for spray application, raising also the possibility of the inhalation exposure.   It is a little concerning when a product which is intended for human exposure, which has demonstrable strong antibacterial properties can enter the marketplace with apparently no requirement to demonstrate either its usefulness or the potential risks. Its also worth pointing out that there is almost no research out there which has looked at the consequences of ingestion of any nanomaterials. Surely a gap which must be filled soon.

Rob Aitken

December 1, 2008 09:35
Anonymous comments are disabled